Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalties should be granted, and whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for complete stay.
Analysis: The alleged liability arose from technical know-how and patent-related rights under a collaboration agreement, which the Department treated as taxable intellectual property service. On a prima facie view, the agreement granted exclusive technical information under relevant patents and contemplated royalty-linked rights in India, while the transfer of know-how appeared to operate on a continuing basis. The appellant did not substantiate the claim of incorrect computation through R&D cess adjustment or financial hardship. The Tribunal also noted that, for the period prior to insertion of Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994, service tax was not payable on the foreign service portion covered by the Bombay High Court ruling in Indian National Shipowners Association.
Conclusion: Complete waiver was declined. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit 25% of the service tax demand as a condition for hearing, and the balance was stayed pending compliance.