Pre-deposit waiver requires undue hardship and revenue safeguards; stay orders cannot rest on limitation alone.

Under a pre-deposit regime, waiver of deposit is an exception and can be granted only on a showing of undue hardship, with conditions imposed to protect revenue. Stay applications in fiscal matters must be assessed on the relevant factors of prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable loss, and revenue safeguarding. An order granting complete waiver and stay merely on limitation grounds, without applying these principles or imposing protective conditions, is unsustainable. The Tribunal's stay order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration under the governing criteria.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could grant waiver of pre-deposit and stay recovery of service tax merely on the ground of limitation without addressing undue hardship and without imposing conditions to safeguard revenue.

Analysis: The statutory scheme made pre-deposit the rule and dispensation an exception. Relief from deposit could be granted only where the assessee showed undue hardship, and even then the appellate forum had to impose conditions necessary to safeguard the interests of revenue. In fiscal matters, stay applications could not be disposed of routinely, and the Tribunal was required to consider the relevant factors of prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable loss, and revenue protection. The impugned order granted complete waiver and stay solely on limitation, without applying those governing principles or imposing protective conditions.

Conclusion: The waiver of pre-deposit and stay order was unsustainable and was rightly interfered with.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the Tribunal's stay order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with the governing principles.

Ratio Decidendi: In appeals governed by a pre-deposit regime, dispensation of deposit is permissible only on a showing of undue hardship and subject to conditions safeguarding revenue, and a stay order passed without applying these requirements is legally unsustainable.

---