Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
ITAT Delhi: Penalties Deleted for Incorrect PAN in e-TDS Returns The ITAT, Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing all four appeals and deleting the penalties imposed under section 272B for failure to quote ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT Delhi: Penalties Deleted for Incorrect PAN in e-TDS Returns
The ITAT, Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing all four appeals and deleting the penalties imposed under section 272B for failure to quote correct PAN in the e-TDS returns. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Press Release issued by CBDT and the compliance of the appellant with the prescribed threshold limit for furnishing PAN data.
Issues: Penalty under section 272B for failure to quote correct PAN in e-TDS returns.
Analysis: The appeals filed by the assessee were against the order of the CIT (Appeals) confirming part of penalties levied under section 272B of the Income-tax Act. The CIT (A) held that penalties under section 272B can be levied in respect of the deductee and not the number of entries. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in manufacturing biscuits, had its registered office in Mumbai and factories in various locations, including Bahadurgarh. The penalties were imposed for not quoting valid PAN of deductees in the e-TDS Quarterly statement of deductions of tax, as required by section 139A (5B) of the Act.
The grounds of appeal in all four appeals were similar, contesting the levy of penalties under section 272B. The appellant argued that the penalties should not exceed a certain limit, irrespective of the number of wrong PAN entries. Additionally, the appellant claimed that after filing revised quarterly statements, the total number of deductees with incorrect PAN was only five. The appellant also cited a decision by ITAT, Bangalore Bench in a similar case, where penalties were deleted based on the interpretation of a Press Release issued by CBDT.
The ITAT, Delhi considered the Press Release of CBDT and the decision of the ITAT, Bangalore Bench in a similar case. The ITAT found that the issue was covered by the decision of the coordinate Bench of ITAT, Bangalore. As the appellant had complied with the threshold limit prescribed in the Press Release by furnishing PAN data to a significant extent, the penal provisions were not attracted. Therefore, the ITAT allowed all four appeals in favor of the assessee, following the decision of the ITAT, Bangalore Bench.
In conclusion, the ITAT, Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing all four appeals and deleting the penalties imposed under section 272B for failure to quote correct PAN in the e-TDS returns. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Press Release issued by CBDT and the compliance of the appellant with the prescribed threshold limit for furnishing PAN data.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.