Inclusive tariff entry for electrical goods covers vacuum cleaners when the article is electrical and not expressly excluded.

An inclusive tariff entry covering electrical goods, instruments, apparatus and appliances was held wide enough to include a vacuum cleaner, which was admittedly electrical and not specifically excluded. The later notification expressly naming vacuum cleaners was treated as irrelevant because the assessment years predated it. Strict construction of taxing statutes did not change the result, since reading the entry to exclude the article would make the provision unduly narrow. The vacuum cleaner was therefore correctly taxed under Entry 81 at the higher rate, and the challenge to the assessment failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether vacuum cleaner fell within Entry 81 of the notification issued under section 12 so as to be taxable at the higher rate applicable to electrical goods.

Analysis: Entry 81 covered electrical goods, instruments, apparatus and appliances by an inclusive description. Vacuum cleaner was an electrical article and was not excluded from the entry. The later 2000 notification specifically mentioning vacuum cleaner was held irrelevant because the assessment years in question were prior to 2000. The rule of strict construction of taxing statutes did not assist the assessee because the entry, properly read, was wide enough to include the article and to avoid rendering the entry otiose.

Conclusion: Vacuum cleaner was rightly treated as covered by Entry 81 and taxable at 12 per cent; the contention that it should be taxed as unspecified goods at 8 per cent was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The concurrent findings of the authorities below were upheld and the challenge to the assessment failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff entry uses an inclusive description of electrical goods and the article in question is admittedly electrical and not specifically excluded, the article falls within the entry notwithstanding that it is not separately named.

---