Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether old and used buoyancy tanks, wire ropes, shackles, chain blocks and hydraulic pumps imported for laying off-shore pipeline were capital goods freely importable under para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09, and whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The imported goods were used in laying off-shore pipeline projects and were therefore treated as capital goods used for rendering services. Under para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09, old and used capital goods could be imported freely without a specific licence. On that footing, the import did not violate the policy and the goods were not liable to confiscation.
Conclusion: The import licence was not required, confiscation was not justified, and redemption fine and penalty were not imposable.