Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in estimating the income of an assessee who kept no books of account, a separate deduction for bonus paid to employees could be allowed from the estimated net profit.
Analysis: The income had been estimated on the basis of past results and comparable cases in the same line of business. The Tribunal found that in earlier years the profit had been worked out at a percentage of receipts after reducing bonus, and that the same method was adopted in comparable handling contractor cases. In such a situation, the quantum of income to be assessed and the expenditure to be allowed are matters of estimation based on surrounding commercial circumstances and past history. The liability for bonus was also recognised as a statutory liability under the bonus legislation, and the payment had in fact been made.
Conclusion: The separate deduction for bonus was permissible, and the question was rightly answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view on estimation of income and allowance of bonus was sustained as a factual determination not giving rise to an error of law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where taxable income is determined by estimation, the allowance of statutory bonus paid to employees may be treated as part of the factual computation of net profit, and such estimation will not be interfered with unless it is arbitrary or capricious.