Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid by a firm to a Hindu undivided family represented by a partner in his representative capacity, where the partner was a partner only in his individual capacity, fell within the disallowance under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The relevant assessment year was 1978-79. The partner concerned was admitted to the firm only in his individual capacity, while the interest in dispute was paid to a separate account maintained for the Hindu undivided family represented by him as karta. The governing principle applied was that the bar under section 40(b) operates only where payment of interest is made to the person in the very same capacity in which he is a partner. The Explanations inserted later were treated as clarificatory and therefore reflective of the law as it stood even before their insertion.
Conclusion: The interest paid to the Hindu undivided family was not payment to a partner within the meaning of section 40(b), and the disallowance was rightly deleted.