Gratuity provision versus reserve under surtax computation turns on actuarial basis and liability treatment.

Leave or retirement gratuity amounts were analysed for capital computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, with the key distinction being whether the credit was a provision for a known liability or a reserve. The governing principle treated gratuity as a known liability: an actuarially valued appropriation is a provision, and even an ad hoc appropriation may be a provision if intended to meet that liability; only any excess over the estimated liability is a reserve. Because the relevant assessment years had not been examined on that basis, the text states that the matter was remanded for fresh determination under the Supreme Court's principles.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amount standing in the leave/retirement gratuity account was to be treated as a provision for a known liability or as a reserve for the purpose of computing capital under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, and whether the matter had to be remanded for application of the Supreme Court's principles.

Analysis: The capital of a company under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, is determined with reference to the relevant previous year, and clause (iii) of that rule requires examination of the company's other reserves. The controlling principle was the Supreme Court's formulation that gratuity is a known liability and that an appropriation based on actuarial valuation constitutes a provision, while an amount appropriated on an ad hoc basis may also be a provision if it is intended to meet that liability; only any excess over the estimated liability is to be treated as reserve. Since the relevant assessment years had not been examined on that footing, the question whether the amounts credited were arrived at on a scientific basis or were ad hoc could not be answered finally.

Conclusion: The question referred was declined to be answered and the matter was remanded to the taxing authority through the Tribunal for fresh determination under the Supreme Court's principles.

---