TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Reimbursed Expenses Excluded from Assessable Value for Service Tax</h1> <h3>CCE, Bhopal Versus M/s Surya Transport Company</h3> CCE, Bhopal Versus M/s Surya Transport Company - 2014 (35) S.T.R. 115 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:1. Inclusion of demurrage/wharfage and local transport expenses in the assessable value of the service for service tax calculation.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a dispute regarding the inclusion of demurrage/wharfage and local transport expenses in the assessable value of clearing and forwarding agent services attracting service tax. The respondent provided C&F services to a cement manufacturer under a contract. The Assistant Commissioner initially held that these expenses should be part of the assessable value, resulting in a service tax demand. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside this decision, stating that these expenses were incurred as a pure agent and should not be included in the assessable value. The Commissioner relied on previous Tribunal judgments emphasizing that expenses reimbursed to the service provider by the client would not form part of the assessable value.The appeal by the Revenue against the Commissioner (Appeals) order was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted that the respondent acted as a pure agent for both demurrage/wharfage charges by the railways and local transport expenses. The respondent maintained godowns, arranged unloading/loading, and transportation as per the principal's directions. The charges for demurrage/wharfage and local transport were reimbursed by the principal on an actual basis. The Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the respondent's role as a pure agent in incurring these expenses meant they should not be included in the assessable value for service tax calculation. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed that the expenses for demurrage/wharfage and local transport incurred by the respondent while acting as a pure agent for the principal should not be considered part of the assessable value for clearing and forwarding agent services, thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
