Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty demand arising from availment of Cenvat credit on commission paid to commission agents for sale of final products.
Analysis: The appellant manufactured electric motors and engaged commission agents for sale of its products. The commission agents received commission for sale services and discharged service tax on the same. On a prima facie view, the activities of the commission agents in selling the appellant's products were treated as covered by Rule 2(l), supporting the claim that the disputed credit could not be rejected at the interim stage.
Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.