TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was prima facie entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. dated 20.7.2010 in respect of services rendered to the power distribution company and whether the demand required re-quantification.
Analysis: The services were stated to have been provided to Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., and the claim was that the notification exempted service tax on services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity for the relevant period. The matter also involved the appellant's plea that the tax demand had been wrongly quantified for the subsequent period. In view of these aspects, the matter required reconsideration by the original adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The issue was left for fresh adjudication by the original authority, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of the exemption claim and re-quantification.
TaxTMI 
