TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court orders interest payment on delayed refunds, emphasizing statutory obligation</h1> <h3>M/s Shree Balaji Aromatics Private Limited And Another Versus Union of India And Others</h3> M/s Shree Balaji Aromatics Private Limited And Another Versus Union of India And Others - TMI Issues:Seeking direction for refund claims along with interest under Section 11-BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Central Excise Act, 1944); Denial of interest on pending refund claim due to waiver claim by the petitioner; Discrepancy in refund claims and issuance of show cause notices; Entitlement to interest under Section 11BB of the Act despite waiver claim by the petitioner; Liability for interest on interest due to illegal withholding of interest.Analysis:The petitioner filed refund claims in various years under Section 11-BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Central Excise Act, 1944). Despite some claims being allowed, interest on pending refund claims was denied based on a letter of waiver by the petitioner. The petitioner argued that interest under Section 11BB is statutory and automatic, not dependent on the claim, citing circulars and legal precedents. The court noted that Section 11BB mandates payment of interest if refund is not made within three months, regardless of waiver claims. The Apex Court's interpretation clarified that interest becomes payable after three months from the application date, irrespective of the order for refund.The court emphasized that interest under Section 11BB is automatic and not discretionary, rejecting the respondent's argument of waiver by the petitioner. The circular highlighted that officers must ensure timely refund processing to avoid interest liability. Legal precedents supported the petitioner's claim for interest, emphasizing the statutory nature of interest payment. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 11BB if refunds are delayed beyond three months, dismissing the argument for interest on interest.In conclusion, the court partially allowed the writ petition, directing the authority to calculate and pay the interest under Section 11BB within a specified timeframe. The judgment clarified the statutory obligation to pay interest on delayed refunds, irrespective of waiver claims, and emphasized the automatic nature of interest under Section 11BB. The decision aligned with legal provisions and established precedents, ensuring timely and fair refund processes under the Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
