Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit by showing that sari guard and mirror assembly cleared with motorcycles were accessories or inputs eligible for Cenvat credit.
Analysis: The safety requirements under the Motor Vehicles Rules showed that sari guard was an essential safety component for motorcycles, and mirror assembly was also treated as a safety component. On that basis, both items were regarded, prima facie, as accessories to motorcycles and therefore as inputs within the meaning of Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This was sufficient to establish a strong prima facie case for interim relief against recovery.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the confirmed credit demand, interest, and penalty was stayed till disposal of the appeal.