Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption under Notification No. 32/1999-C.E. had to be computed on a daily basis by taking credit availability as on the date of each clearance, or on a monthly basis by considering the duty paid in cash at the end of the month.
Analysis: The notification prescribed two limits for the benefit, namely, an upper limit linked to the prescribed value addition and a lower limit tied to the duty actually paid in cash. Since duty payment and utilisation of Cenvat credit were made on a monthly basis, there was no warrant in the notification for adopting a daily computation. The appellant could not be denied the benefit of the lower limit expressly provided in the notification merely because the department sought to test entitlement with reference to each day's clearance.
Conclusion: The exemption was required to be computed on a monthly basis, and the appellant was entitled to the amount of duty paid in cash claimed under the notification.