TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue appeal dismissed by CESTAT for lack of authorization and missing signatures</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR-II Versus HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed Revenue's appeal for being not maintainable due to lack of proper authorization and missing dates and ... Maintainability of appeal - Authorization under law - Improper authorization order of committee of commissioner - Date not mentioned - Section 35B - Held that:- First page and signature of members of committee not dated as required under law - Not clear whether decision of committee finally took place - Appeal not maintainable. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed Revenue's appeal as not maintainable due to lack of proper authorization and absence of dates on the first page and signatures of the Committee members.
TaxTMI 
