Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit made under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be treated as duty so as to permit availment of Cenvat credit on the basis of supplementary invoices, and whether the demand and consequential penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the assessee's own earlier case had already held that there was no justification to deny Cenvat credit of a pre-deposit made under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It followed that view and held that the amount deposited as pre-deposit could be availed as Cenvat credit. Once the credit was held admissible, the demand raised on the premise of inadmissible credit could not survive. The setting aside of penalty followed from the same conclusion.
Conclusion: The Cenvat credit of the pre-deposit made under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held admissible, and the demand was set aside.