Deemed income on cessation of liability: accrual follows final judicial determination; refund inclusion for earlier year quashed.

Deemed income on cessation of liability turns on final judicial determination: under the mercantile system the right to enhanced compensation accrues only when liability is finally extinguished. Pending appeals left no present right to the additional amount, so benefit of prior deductions crystallised only upon the Supreme Court judgment; the Kerala High Court found inclusion of the later refund in an earlier assessment year unlawful and quashed the assessment and revision orders to that extent.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the refund obtained by the petitioner is includible in the total income and taxable.
2. If includible, whether it can be included in the income of the petitioner for the assessment year 1974-75.

Summary:

Issue 1: Includibility of Refund in Total Income
The petitioner, a registered firm dealing in hill produce, received a refund of administrative surcharge on tapioca collected and paid to the Government. The High Court annulled the levy of the surcharge and ordered a refund, which was upheld by the Supreme Court. The Income-tax Officer included the refund amount of Rs. 1,17,459 in the total income of the petitioner for the assessment year 1974-75 u/s 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioner contended that the refund was not income and should not be included in the total income.

Issue 2: Assessment Year for Inclusion
The petitioner argued that even if the refund was considered income, it should not be included in the assessment year 1974-75. The High Court annulled the surcharge on September 27, 1971, and the Supreme Court upheld this on November 7, 1974. The refund was received on May 28, 1973. The Revenue included the refund in the income for the year 1974-75, relying on section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, which deals with profits chargeable to tax when an allowance or deduction has been made in respect of a trading liability that subsequently ceases.

Court's Analysis:
The court noted that section 41(1) is a machinery section and not a charging section. It requires the cessation of liability to be deemed income of the previous year. The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Hindustan Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. [1986] 161 ITR 524, which held that income accrues only when there is an absolute right to receive it. Since the refund was received while the appeal was pending before the Supreme Court, there was no absolute right to the refund until the Supreme Court's decision on November 7, 1974. Therefore, the liability ceased only then, making the refund relevant for the assessment year 1975-76.

Conclusion:
The court held that the Income-tax Officer acted illegally and without jurisdiction in including the refund amount in the total income for the assessment year 1974-75. Exhibits P-1 and P-3, which affirmed this inclusion, were quashed. The original petition was allowed, with no order as to costs.

---