Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clinkers manufactured and captively consumed in the manufacture of cement were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE, and whether pre-deposit of duty and penalty should be waived with stay of recovery.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier order in the appellant's own case and the earlier order in Ultratech Cements Ltd., holding that the proviso to Notification No. 67/95-CE did not bar captive consumption exemption in the facts considered. On that basis, the Tribunal granted interim relief pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeal.