Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether diesel and lubricants used in a captive power plant for generation of electricity for running the factory were liable to tax at the concessional rate applicable to raw material, or at the higher rate applicable to power generation.
Analysis: The controlling principle was that the statutory definition of raw material was an inclusive one and specifically covered fuel required for the purpose of manufacture. Diesel and lubricants used to generate electricity through DG sets for manufacturing yarn therefore fell within the enlarged meaning of raw material. Once the legislature had expressly included such fuel within the definition, the distinction between direct and indirect use in the manufacturing process was immaterial. The issue was already settled by the Supreme Court and there was no contrary legal position shown.
Conclusion: The concessional rate was applicable and the demand based on the higher rate was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory definition of raw material expressly includes fuel required for manufacture, diesel and lubricants used for generating electricity for manufacturing purposes are to be treated as raw material for tax purposes.