Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty and penalty demand arising from denial of exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The exemption notifications covered paper and paperboard manufactured starting from the stage of pulp. The Board circular clarified that the concession would not be denied merely because the pulp was not manufactured in the same factory, so long as the goods were manufactured from pulp of the required specification. The order further noted that the denial of exemption in the impugned order was based on the alleged absence of testing regarding the pulp content, which appeared to go beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
Conclusion: The appellant had established a prima facie case for waiver of the entire predeposit of duty and penalty, and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.