Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the ground that the demand appeared to be barred by limitation and that the procedure under Notification No. 108/1995-C.E. had been followed.
Analysis: The record showed that the project authority certificate had been obtained and submitted, the Assistant Commissioner had acknowledged receipt and directed further intimation to the Range Officer, and the clearances were made under invoice with reference to that communication. On these facts, the procedure prescribed by Notification No. 108/1995-C.E. appeared to have been complied with. The demand was also found to rest on a prima facie doubtful invocation of the extended period, especially when the relevant facts were already within the department's knowledge. The notification explanation further indicated that supply to the contractor was not, by itself, fatal to the exemption claim at this stage.
Conclusion: The appellants were held to have established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Final Conclusion: Interim protection was granted to the appellants, and the demand was not required to be secured during the pendency of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the record shows prima facie compliance with the exemption notification procedure and the invocation of the extended period is doubtful on facts already known to the department, complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery may be granted.