Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after recording a finding of suppression of facts and non-payment of duty, the Tribunal could impose a penalty lower than the amount of duty payable under the excise law.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by an earlier Division Bench decision holding that, where the conditions for invoking section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are satisfied, the quantum of penalty equal to the duty determined is mandatory. Once section 11AC applies, neither the adjudicating authority nor the Tribunal has discretion to impose a lesser penalty. The same principle governed the present appeal, and the assessee did not dispute that the question stood answered against it.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had no discretion to reduce the penalty below the duty amount; the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.