Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of duty and penalty should be waived and recovery stayed pending the appeal in view of the claim that supplies to SEZ are to be treated as export and that captive consumption of clinker attracted exemption.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a demand raised on clinker used captively in the manufacture of cement supplied to SEZ. The Tribunal noted the competing views on whether such SEZ supplies are to be treated as export for excise purposes and observed that the Board's circular supported treatment of SEZ supplies as export. In view of these considerations and the existence of conflicting decisions, the Tribunal found it appropriate to grant interim relief at the stage of admission.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty was waived and stay on recovery was granted during the pendency of the appeal.