Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement cleared in 50 kg bags through the assessee's depot qualified for the benefit of Sl. No. 1C of Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. dated 01-03-2006, and whether the depot arrangement defeated the condition that the commodity be purchased from the manufacturer under Rule 2(a) of the SWM Rules.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the construction of Rule 2(a) of the SWM Rules and the notification condition that the industrial consumer should have purchased the commodity from the manufacturer. The assessee's depot was not a separate entity from the manufacturer for this purpose. The same issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour in an earlier Tribunal decision, which supported the view that clearances through the depot did not take the case outside Sl. No. 1C of the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Sl. No. 1C of Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. and the Revenue's objection based on depot clearances failed.