Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case against the demand of Cenvat credit and were entitled to interim relief without substantial pre-deposit.
Analysis: The credit was claimed on rolled products, rejected pieces, CR sheets, wires and old parts described as scrap. The material on record, including supplier statements and the nature of the goods, indicated that many of these items were finished or reusable products capable of use in other industries and not waste or scrap for furnace consumption. The order also noted that some credits had already been reversed, that the transactions bore indicators of paper entries, and that the appellant had failed to establish actual use of the inputs as required under the Cenvat credit framework. On this material, the balance of convenience was held to lie with Revenue.
Conclusion: The appellants did not establish a prima facie entitlement to full waiver, and a pre-deposit of Rs. 40 lakhs was directed.