Appeal granted for cenvat credit under reverse charge mechanism. High Court judgments support appellant's position.

The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, confirming their right to utilize cenvat credit for service tax payment under the reverse charge mechanism of Section 66 A of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal relied on judgments from various High Courts, including Punjab & Haryana, Delhi, and Himachal Pradesh, supporting the appellant's position and overturning the department's contention.

---

---

Issues:
Whether cenvat credit can be utilized for payment of service tax under reverse charge mechanism of Section 66 A of Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellant, a manufacturer of manmade yarn, who exported goods and received services from foreign commission agents, paying service tax under Section 66 A of the Finance Act, 1994. The dispute arose when the department contended that the appellant, as a recipient of taxable services, could not utilize cenvat credit for service tax payment. A show cause notice was issued, leading to confirmation of service tax demand, interest, and penalties by the Joint Commissioner, upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).

The primary issue before the tribunal was whether the appellant could use cenvat credit for service tax payment under reverse charge mechanism. The appellant argued citing judgments by different High Courts, including Punjab & Haryana, Delhi, and Himachal Pradesh, supporting their position. The appellant contended that these judgments established the legality of using cenvat credit for such payments, contrary to the department's stance.

On the other hand, the Joint CDR defended the department's position by referring to a Tribunal judgment from Bangalore, emphasizing that a person deemed a provider of taxable service could not consider the service received as their output service. The Joint CDR highlighted the need to adhere to the definition of 'output service' as per the Cenvat Credit Rules, which the High Courts' judgments allegedly overlooked.

After considering both parties' arguments and reviewing the records, the tribunal found merit in the appellant's position. The tribunal relied on the judgments of the High Courts, including Punjab & Haryana, Delhi, and Himachal Pradesh, which supported the appellant's right to utilize cenvat credit for service tax payment under reverse charge mechanism. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.

In conclusion, the tribunal's decision favored the appellant's ability to use cenvat credit for service tax payment under the reverse charge mechanism, aligning with the judgments of various High Courts. The tribunal's ruling overturned the department's contention, emphasizing the legal precedence established by the High Courts on this issue.

---