Government company's appeal allowed by Tribunal due to time-barred demand, emphasizing factual awareness and official communications.

The appeal before the Tribunal was filed by a Government company providing logistic arrangements for a yatra organized by the Ministry of External Affairs. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal as time-barred, but the Tribunal found that the demand was time-barred due to official correspondence with the Ministry of External Affairs requesting exemption from service tax. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed recovery until the appeal's disposal, emphasizing the significance of tax authorities' factual awareness and official communications in determining time-barred appeals.

---

---

Issues:
1. Time bar on filing appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)
2. Applicability of extended limitation period for service tax demand

Analysis:
1. The appellant, a Government company, provided logistic arrangements for the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra organized by the Ministry of External Affairs. The department alleged that the appellant was providing tour operator services attracting service tax. A show cause notice was issued for service tax demand, interest, and penalties for the period from 01/4/05 to 31/3/09, invoking an extended limitation period. The Additional Commissioner confirmed a part of the demand, imposing penalties. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal as time-barred, leading to the current appeal and stay application.

2. The appellant argued that the demand was time-barred, citing a letter from the Ministry of External Affairs in 2008 requesting exemption from service tax for the yatra activities. They contended that the department was aware of their role, thus no suppression of facts occurred. The Tribunal noted that the department's knowledge of the yatra activities through official correspondence indicated no intent to evade tax. Being a state government undertaking, the appellant's alleged suppression was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case on limitation, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying recovery until appeal disposal.

This judgment highlights the importance of factual awareness by tax authorities in determining time-barred appeals and the relevance of official communications in establishing a strong case on limitation.

---