Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of Cenvat credit demand on insurance premium paid for group medical insurance of workers.
Analysis: The demand was proposed on the ground that the insurance service had no nexus with manufacture and was not an input service. The notice did not allege that the policy covered the employees' family members, and that new ground was introduced for the first time in appeal. An adjudication or appellate order cannot travel beyond the allegations in the show cause notice. Prima facie, the insurance premium formed part of the cost of production, and judicial precedents supported eligibility of credit on medical insurance for workers. These factors established a prima facie case in favour of the appellant for interim relief.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of the Cenvat credit demand, interest, and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.