Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (2) TMI 801 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court: Undisclosed income post-return filing is concealed income under Section 158BC proviso; penalties under 158BFA The High Court held that the second proviso to Section 158BC is mandatory, requiring any undisclosed income revealed after filing the return to be treated ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            High Court: Undisclosed income post-return filing is concealed income under Section 158BC proviso; penalties under 158BFA

                            The High Court held that the second proviso to Section 158BC is mandatory, requiring any undisclosed income revealed after filing the return to be treated as concealed income, thus attracting penalties under Section 158BFA. The Court set aside the previous decisions and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the strict application of statutory provisions despite the assessee's claims regarding non-supply of documents and intention in disclosing additional income.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Legality of imposing penalty under Section 158BFA of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Interpretation and application of the second proviso to Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act.
                            3. Validity of the assessee's claim regarding non-supply of documents by the Department.
                            4. Consideration of the assessee's intention and bona fide disclosure of additional income.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legality of Imposing Penalty under Section 158BFA:
                            The Revenue challenged the CIT (Appeals) and Tribunal's decision to reject the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 158BFA. The Tribunal held that no material evidence showed the assessee was provided with photocopies of the seized materials before filing the return. The Tribunal concluded that the additional income disclosed by the assessee was not concealed income as per Section 158BFA. However, the High Court held that the second proviso to Section 158BC is mandatory, and any undisclosed income revealed after filing the return should be treated as concealed income, thus attracting a penalty under Section 158BFA.

                            2. Interpretation and Application of the Second Proviso to Section 158BC:
                            The Revenue argued that once a return under Section 158BC is filed, the assessee is not entitled to file a revised return. The Tribunal's interpretation that the second proviso to Section 158BC is only for assessment purposes and does not attract penalties was found erroneous by the High Court. The High Court emphasized that the second proviso is mandatory, preventing the assessee from filing revised returns to avoid penalties.

                            3. Validity of the Assessee's Claim Regarding Non-Supply of Documents:
                            The assessee contended that the delay in filing the return was due to the Department's failure to provide the necessary documents. The Tribunal accepted this argument, stating that the assessee was not provided with the seized materials in time. However, the High Court found no substantial evidence to support this claim, noting that the assessee had made multiple requests and was eventually allowed to take photocopies. The High Court concluded that the plea of non-supply of documents was not valid for filing a revised return but could be used to challenge the final order on natural justice grounds.

                            4. Consideration of the Assessee's Intention and Bona Fide Disclosure of Additional Income:
                            The Tribunal and CIT (Appeals) accepted the assessee's argument that the additional income was disclosed voluntarily and in good faith before any notice from the Assessing Officer, implying no malafide intention. The High Court, however, ruled that the intention of the assessee is immaterial under the mandatory provisions of Section 158BC and 158BFA. The High Court cited precedents from the Supreme Court, emphasizing that penalties are attracted as soon as statutory obligations are violated, regardless of intention.

                            Conclusion:
                            The High Court set aside the orders of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, remitting the matter back to the CIT (Appeals) for fresh consideration. The Court held that the second proviso to Section 158BC is mandatory, and any undisclosed income revealed after filing the return under Section 158BC should be treated as concealed income, attracting penalties under Section 158BFA. The plea of non-supply of documents was deemed insufficient to justify filing a revised return. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the strict application of the statutory provisions.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found