Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be demanded on delayed payment of duty arising from transit loss in excess of the condonable limit where the governing warehousing provision did not specify any interest rate.
Analysis: The dispute was confined to interest liability. The Tribunal noted that, in the comparable precedent relied upon, the matter had been remanded for consideration of the assessee's contentions under the warehousing provisions. Rule 20 made the facility of removal without payment of duty subject to conditions, including interest, only as specified by the Board. The cited circular, however, dealt with recovery of duty where the warehousing certificate was not received and did not specify any interest component. In that situation, interest could not be confirmed under Section 11AB merely on the basis of delayed duty payment when the governing board-prescribed conditions did not expressly provide for such interest.
Conclusion: The demand of interest was not sustained and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the adjudicating authority was directed to reconsider the issue after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a warehousing provision makes interest recoverable only as specified by the Board and the Board has not prescribed interest for the relevant default, interest cannot be demanded independently under the general interest provision.