Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cause title of the appeal required correction by substituting Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai in place of Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai IV Commissionerate.
Analysis: The application was supported by the fact that the show cause notices related to service tax jurisdiction and that the adjudication had been assigned to the Central Excise Commissionerate under the relevant notification. On perusal of the records, the Tribunal found that the respondent description in the cause title did not correctly reflect the proper service tax authority and therefore required amendment.
Conclusion: The application was allowed and the Registry was directed to substitute Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai for Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai IV Commissionerate in the cause title.