Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the challenge to the notice under Section 12(3) of the U.P. Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2007 could be finally adjudicated in writ jurisdiction, or whether the petitioner's objections were required to be decided by the competent authority on merits.
Analysis: The controversy turned on whether the petitioner's sugar sales were effected at the factory gate or whether the selling agents introduced the goods into different local areas so as to attract entry tax and consequential penalty. The legal question had already been addressed in earlier binding precedent, but the factual position regarding the situs and manner of sale still required examination by the assessing authority. Since the impugned notice was only a show cause notice and the petitioner had not yet placed its objections before the authority, the proper course was for the authority to consider those objections and pass a reasoned order.
Conclusion: The notice was not quashed at this stage, and the petitioner's objections were directed to be decided on merits by a reasoned order.