Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty and penalty should be granted, and whether recovery should be stayed pending disposal of the appeals, in a case where Cenvat credit on rent-a-cab services was disputed on the ground of use for unofficial work.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the credit had been denied because the cabs were used not only by employees but also by family members for unofficial purposes. It held, prima facie, that trips for unofficial work would not be eligible for Cenvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Since the entire matter required detailed examination at the appeal stage, the Tribunal considered it appropriate to impose a condition for hearing the appeals and grant interim protection for the balance demand.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within eight weeks, and on compliance, waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amount and stay of recovery were granted till disposal of the appeals.