Invalid Reopening of Tax Assessment for 1995-96; Assessment Void Ab Initio

Amarlal Bajaj Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Amarlal Bajaj Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax - TMI Issues involved:
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 1995-96.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Validity of Reopening of Assessment
- The assessee challenged the validity of the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, claiming it was without jurisdiction and void ab initio.
- The return of income was filed by the assessee, and the assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened to examine issues related to loans, expenses, and bills.
- The assessee argued that the reopening was in contravention of the provisions of Section 151 of the Act, which mandates prior sanction from the appropriate Commissioner for reopening assessments after four years.
- The Commissioner's sanction is crucial, requiring application of mind and due diligence before granting approval. However, in this case, the Commissioner merely affixed 'approved' without recording satisfaction, as evidenced by the order sheet.
- The Tribunal emphasized that Sections 147 and 148 serve as a sword for the Revenue and a shield for the assessee, with Section 151 acting as a safeguard against unnecessary harassment. The Commissioner's satisfaction is pivotal before issuing a notice under Section 148.
- Citing the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, it was highlighted that the Commissioner's approval must not be granted mechanically. In this case, the Commissioner's approval lacked proper application of mind, rendering the reopening proceedings invalid.
- Consequently, the Tribunal held that the reopening proceedings were bad in law, declaring the assessment as void ab initio. The assessee's appeal was allowed, and the Revenue's cross-appeal was dismissed.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found the reopening of the assessment to be invalid due to the lack of proper sanction from the Commissioner as required under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act. As a result, the assessment for the relevant year was declared void ab initio, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal and the dismissal of the Revenue's cross-appeal.