AO's approval under Section 153D invalid due to procedural deficiencies and mechanical rubber stamp process

ITAT Delhi held that approval granted under section 153D was invalid due to procedural deficiencies. The AO sent only draft assessment orders without assessment records or seized materials to the Additional Commissioner for approval. The Approving Authority granted approval on the same day without examining the assessment records or seized materials, acting as a mere rubber stamp without application of mind. The approval was deemed mechanical and not in accordance with statutory provisions under section 153D. The assessee's appeal was allowed based on the invalid approval process.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of assessment orders due to alleged invalid approval under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Compliance with procedural requirements for granting approval under Section 153D.
3. Impact of mechanical approval on the validity of assessment orders.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Assessment Orders due to Alleged Invalid Approval under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

The primary issue in the appeals was the validity of the assessment orders based on the alleged invalid approval granted under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee challenged the assessment orders on the grounds that the approval granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax was mechanical and lacked proper application of mind. The Tribunal noted that Section 153D mandates prior approval from a competent authority before passing any assessment or reassessment order in search-related cases. The Tribunal emphasized that the approval process should involve a thorough examination of the assessment records and seized materials, which was not evident in this case.

2. Compliance with Procedural Requirements for Granting Approval under Section 153D:

The Tribunal scrutinized the procedural compliance regarding the approval process under Section 153D. It observed that the Additional Commissioner granted approval for multiple assessment orders on the same day without referring to any seized material or assessment records, indicating a lack of due diligence. The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents, including decisions from the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which underscored the necessity for the approving authority to apply its mind judiciously and not act as a mere rubber stamp. The Tribunal concluded that the approval granted was not in accordance with the provisions of Section 153D, rendering it invalid.

3. Impact of Mechanical Approval on the Validity of Assessment Orders:

The Tribunal analyzed the consequences of mechanical approval on the validity of the assessment orders. It highlighted that the approval granted under Section 153D serves as an in-built protection against arbitrary or unjust exercise of power by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the approval in question was granted without proper examination of the relevant materials, thus failing to meet the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the assessment orders passed based on such invalid approval were also invalid and deserved to be quashed.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the approval granted under Section 153D was mechanical and lacked the necessary application of mind, rendering it invalid. As a result, the assessment orders passed in pursuance of such approval were also invalid and were quashed. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals and dismissed the Revenue's appeals as infructuous, given the quashing of the assessment orders. The decision emphasized the importance of adherence to procedural safeguards and the necessity for a judicious approach in granting approvals under Section 153D to uphold the validity of assessment orders.

---