Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in view of their claim that the impugned service fell within the relevant taxable category and that the benefit of Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006 was available.
Analysis: The dispute related to the period 16.06.2005 to 31.03.2008. The activity described by the applicants was repair, renovation and alteration of existing office and commercial premises such as banks and call centres. On the material before the Tribunal, there was no evidence that the applicants had undertaken completion or finishing services of the kind relied upon by the Revenue to deny the notification benefit. The activity was treated, prima facie, as falling within the relevant category supporting the applicants' claim for partial tax treatment under the notification.
Conclusion: The applicants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, and the stay petition was allowed.