Composition notification challenge fails where dealer denies underlying tax liability under the charging provisions

A dealer may invoke composition notifications under Section 5-A of the Jammu and Kashmir Sales Tax Act, 1962 only if it falls within the class of assessees liable to tax under the charging provisions. Because the assessee itself denied liability to sales tax or purchase tax under Sections 4 and 4-B, it could not claim the composition benefit and then challenge the notifications in writ proceedings. The challenge was therefore misconceived, and the civil appeal was dismissed, with liberty left open to pursue objections against any demand notices before the appropriate statutory authorities.

---

---

Issues: Whether an assessee, who claimed that it was not liable to pay sales tax or purchase tax under the Jammu and Kashmir Sales Tax Act, 1962, could invoke the composition notifications issued under Section 5-A of that Act and challenge them in writ proceedings.

Analysis: Section 5-A authorises composition only in respect of tax payable by a dealer under the Act, and the statutory setting shows that the composition benefit is linked to liability under the charging provisions, namely Sections 4 and 4-B. The assessee itself asserted that it was not liable to pay tax under those provisions. On that footing, it could not claim the benefit of the composition scheme and then question the notifications through writ jurisdiction. The challenge was therefore misconceived.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to assail the composition notifications, and the challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The civil appeal was dismissed, while leaving open the appellant's remedy against any demand notices before the appropriate statutory authorities.

Ratio Decidendi: A dealer can challenge a composition notification under Section 5-A only if it is within the class of assessees liable to tax under the charging provisions of the Act.

---