Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of appeal on the ground that the value of parts used in free service was not includible in the taxable value of service.
Analysis: The activity described as free service was held to involve consideration from the vehicle manufacturer for both service and parts. On a prima facie view, the parts used in the service were treated as goods sold to the person making payment, and the benefit of the exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST dated 20.06.2003 was considered available. In that view, the demand raised on the value of the parts did not warrant immediate deposit at the stage of admission of appeal.
Conclusion: The applicant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.