Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of the balance demand, interest and penalties and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The dispute at the stay stage concerned service tax demands arising from alleged taxable services and denial of credit. The Tribunal found prima facie that the sale of spare parts and components during warranty repairs, against invoices with VAT or sales tax paid, could not be treated as part of the service value. It also found prima facie that dealer incentives paid by the manufacturer had a direct nexus with the sale of goods and were not, on the face of it, consideration for business auxiliary service. The remaining issues, including demands relating to other services and the limitation plea, required detailed examination at final hearing. Financial hardship was pleaded but not substantiated by evidence.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted partial relief by way of waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amount on deposit of Rs. 40,00,000, and recovery of the balance demand was stayed till disposal of the appeal.