Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the share income arising to the minor son from a partnership firm was includible in the total income of the assessee mother under section 64(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the fact that the investment in the firm came from Hindu undivided family funds affected that inclusion.
Analysis: Section 64(1)(iii) applies where income arises to a minor child from a partnership firm by reason of admission to the benefits of the firm, in which event the income is to be included in the total income of the parent. The source of the minor's investment in the firm is not decisive for the application of the provision. The fact that the minor was said to represent a Hindu undivided family in the partnership did not alter the statutory consequence when the income was referable to admission to the benefits of partnership.
Conclusion: The share income of the minor son was rightly added to the assessee's income, and the questions referred were answered in the affirmative, against the assessee.