Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was leviable when the service tax and interest had been paid before issuance of the show cause notice and the dispute related to the initial period after the levy of outdoor catering service.
Analysis: The demand of service tax with interest was not contested and had already been discharged before the show cause notice. The dispute survived only on the question of penalty. Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 provided that no penalty was to be imposed under Sections 76, 77 or 78 if the assessee established reasonable cause for the failure. As the liability arose in the initial period when outdoor catering service had newly come within the service tax net, the respondents were held to have shown reasonable cause for the lapse.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable on the respondents under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Final Conclusion: The tax demand with interest stood restored, but the penalty component was set aside in view of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax and interest are paid before the show cause notice and the default occurs in the initial period of levy, Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 bars penalty if reasonable cause is established.