Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in respect of service tax demanded on commission received for sale of Amway products and for grant of stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The demand was founded on the view that the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Small Scale Notification No. 06/2005-S.T. in relation to services connected with the sale of products of another person. The notification was examined and it was found that, prima facie, it contemplated denial of the benefit only where the taxable service was rendered under the brand name or trade name registered in the name of another person. On the facts presented, the commission was received for the sale of goods, and a prima facie case for waiver was made out.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the demanded amount was stayed till disposal of the appeal.