Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied by notice of demand when the assessment order did not record any direction for charging such interest.
Analysis: The statutory interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C is mandatory in nature, but the Court followed its own Division Bench precedent holding that, for recovery through a notice of demand under section 156, the assessment order must contain the levy or direction to charge interest. In the absence of such a direction in the assessment order, interest could not be fastened merely by issuing a demand notice. The Court declined to accept the Revenue's contrary contention in view of the binding earlier decision of the same Court.
Conclusion: The levy of interest could not be sustained in the absence of a direction in the assessment order, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's deletion of the interest demand was upheld and the revenue appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessment order does not record a direction for charging interest, a notice of demand cannot validly create or recover such interest, notwithstanding the mandatory character of interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C.