Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under sections 234A and 234B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained in the absence of a specific direction in the assessment order, and whether any substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's order.
Analysis: The Tribunal had deleted the interest charged under sections 234A and 234B. The governing view, as affirmed by the Supreme Court, is that a notice of demand claiming interest can be issued only when the assessment order contains a specific direction for levy of such interest. In the present case, the assessment order contained no direction for charging interest under sections 234A and 234B. In these circumstances, the Tribunal's order was consistent with the authoritative pronouncements, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration under section 260A.
Conclusion: The challenge to deletion of interest failed, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest under sections 234A and 234B cannot be recovered by a notice of demand unless the assessment order itself contains a specific direction for levy of such interest.