Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The assessee had already discharged a substantial part of the service tax liability under the works contract scheme. The remaining disputed amount was found to be only a small balance, and the order noted that the assessee had not been properly guided when the statement was recorded. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considered it to direct a limited further deposit and grant protection against recovery of the balance during the pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: The assessee was directed to deposit Rs. 24,000 within four weeks, and on such deposit the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining dues was stayed during the appeal.