Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer was bound to make a reference to the Valuation Officer under Section 55A of the Income-tax Act for determining the fair market value of the capital asset.
Analysis: The assessee's valuation was based on a registered valuer's estimate, but the revenue authorities relied on contemporaneous documentary material from UPSIDC showing the rate of the plot as on 1 April 1981. Since the assessee did not dispute that material rate and there was no real dispute requiring independent valuation, the statutory power under Section 55A was not attracted. A reference to the Valuation Officer is warranted only where the Assessing Officer has reason to doubt or otherwise needs assistance in determining fair market value on the relevant facts.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue; the refusal to refer the matter to the Valuation Officer was upheld.