Gratuity fund contributions remain deductible where they discharge an existing statutory liability despite rule-based limits.

Employer contributions to an approved gratuity fund are deductible under the Income-tax Act when read harmoniously with the statutory gratuity regime. The text states that section 36(1)(v) allows sums paid to an approved gratuity fund, and that gratuity liability, when scientifically or actuarially ascertained, is a proper business charge. It further notes that actual payment towards that liability is allowable in the year of payment, and that rule 103 cannot be read so restrictively as to deny deduction for excess contribution made to meet an existing statutory obligation. On that basis, the disallowance is described as unsustainable and the excess contribution as allowable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the employer's contribution to an approved gratuity fund, to the extent it exceeded the limit in rule 103 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, was deductible under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the amount required to be provided under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, could be claimed as deduction in the relevant assessment years.

Analysis: Section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 permits deduction of sums paid by an employer to an approved gratuity fund, but the Court held that this provision must be read harmoniously with the statutory gratuity regime and the accepted principles governing business deductions. The Court accepted the principle that gratuity liability, when ascertained on a scientific or actuarial basis, represents a proper charge against business profits. It further held that actual payment made towards gratuity liability is allowable in the year of payment, and that the restrictive reading placed on rule 103 could not defeat deduction of the excess amount where the contribution was made to meet an existing statutory liability.

Conclusion: The disallowance was unsustainable. The excess contribution to the gratuity fund was allowable as deduction, including the amounts disallowed for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

---