Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the demand raised on disallowance of Cenvat credit on input services.
Analysis: The appellant sought waiver on the ground that the invoices stood in the name of its head office while the services were used at different units. The Tribunal noted that, where input service invoices are raised in the name of the head office or circle office and the services are used across different units, the head office is required to be registered as an input service distributor and to issue invoices to the units. As the head office had not been registered as such, the Tribunal found a prima facie failure to follow the procedure prescribed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. At the same time, considering the factual position and balancing the interests of revenue, the Tribunal granted partial relief by directing a limited pre-deposit and staying recovery of the balance during pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: The prayer for complete waiver was rejected, but partial waiver was granted on condition of depositing Rs. 13 lakhs, with the balance stayed pending appeal.