Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the service tax demand, including the plea that the service related to cargo handling of agricultural produce and was covered by exemption.
Analysis: The appellants relied on the earlier finding that the service did not amount to clearing and forwarding service and that the earlier demand was time-barred, and contended that the extended period could not be invoked for the later period. It was also pointed out that the service rendered in relation to wheat was in the nature of cargo handling service and that Notification No. 10/2002-S.T. provided exemption for such service when rendered for agricultural produce. On the material placed, a prima facie case for relief from pre-deposit was found.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived during the pendency of the appeal.