Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be treated as a manufacturer in respect of used or second-hand arms purchased from licencees, so as to fasten tax liability on the sale of such goods.
Analysis: The definition of manufacturer under Section 2(ee) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires either a dealer making the first sale of goods in the State after manufacture or a dealer purchasing from another dealer not liable to tax on his sale. The record showed that the old arms were purchased from licencees, but there was no finding that those persons carried on the business of buying or selling goods so as to qualify as dealers within Section 2(c). There was also no basis to treat the assessee as the person making the first sale in the State after manufacture, since the sale by the earlier sellers would constitute the first sale. Tax on arms and ammunitions being leviable only at manufacture or import, the assessee could not be brought within the charging event by treating it as a manufacturer.
Conclusion: The assessee was not a manufacturer in relation to the old arms purchased from the licencees, and the tax levies based on that premise were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A purchaser of second-hand goods can be treated as a manufacturer only if the statutory conditions in the definition are satisfied, including purchase from a dealer or being the first seller in the State after manufacture; absence of either condition prevents levy of tax on that basis.